Taxing our way to prosperity ....here comes the business tax
Original post made by Chris on Mar 10, 2007
Nevermind that, as the linked piece shows, there is a fairness issue since businesses already pay a majority of the taxes in town. The real issue is that Palo Alto, which already has a reputation of being an expensive and unfriendly place to operate, is adding one more reason for businesses to stay away.
This tax might give the Council a year or so reprieve from the fiscal hanging that's coming to them, but in the long run it can only make the problem worse.
There's plenty of commercial vacancy in the south bay and peninsula real estate market right now. If you were a company looking to expand or relocate, how much more likely is it that you'd choose Palo Alto, which if Bern Beecham has his way, will be the only local city with this kind of levy?
If our companies start putting their employees in Sunnyvale or Mountain View, they'll not only take the illusory $50 per head Beecham covets, they'll take their property, sales and utility tax revenues with them - actually costing the city revenue.
Then we'll see more posts on this forum asking why Mountain View has a surplus, while Palo Alto struggles. (See here:Web Link)
Oh well, at least Beecham can claim he's doing something about the jobs/housing imbalance.
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Palo Alto quietly gets new evening food truck market
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 996 views
SJSU Center for Steinbeck Studies to Honor Author Khaled Hosseini on Weds Sept 10
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 812 views
Candidate Kickoff Events: Public, not just for supporters
By Douglas Moran | 4 comments | 471 views