Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jun 28, 2014
The City of Palo Alto if it wants to actually do something useful, needs
to restrict watering of lawns to certain hours and certain days and employ "water police" like in L.A. to give advice, warnings, and citations if necessary to repeated offenders.
I think the city needs to monitor homes that do not perform maintenance on leaf build up, tree overhang on the street, and general pick-up maintenance. The neighborhood is now starting to have a rat problem due to lack of maintenance. Time to start calling the city to come out and inspect properties to remove places where rats can nest.
One walked across the patio during the day to get a drink of water from a plant dish. Others are now digging under the fence. My property is kept very tidy and neat but some other neighbors are letting stuff die and pile up.
The city needs to clean up San Francisquito Creek to clear dry brush, dead tree limbs, and overgrowth of plants.
We have a so-called drought-resistant front yard and a flagstone back yard. We eat off paper plates to reduce dish washing and take most of our showers at the gym.
Yet we still get letters from the utility department saying that we are using too much water, far more than neighbors with similar sized households.
I call foul! How many household in Palo Alto pack seven residents into a 1600 sf house on a 5000 sf lot? How many ONLY use water to do laundry ( and then air-dry it)?
You should check to make sure you don't have a water leak somewhere. The letter we get from the utility department accurately describes our resource usage.
I live in Colorado where people have been replacing their lawns for years. We must become conscious of our water use. The ground water in our aquifers is running out! I just heard an NPR story yesterday about the aquifer in Southern CA being reduced at an alarming rate due to the drought. Read "Ogallala Road" by Julene Bair, a memoir, to get an amazingly intimate perspective on this critical issue; read The Fifth Sacred Thing by Starhawk to imagine a world in which water is what people die to attain. Bravo to Deva Luna for becoming an expert in reducing water consumption!
So if we are in a drought, why are builders still allowed to "dewater" new construction?
@Palo Alto resident,
"So if we are in a drought, why are builders still allowed to "dewater" new construction? "
Not to mention, why isn't City Council required to consider water resources and infrastructure when it comes to all the new residents and workers every overbuilt project they approve brings here? We're not in isolation, either, it's the whole region. Where is the point of saturation? How much more water will thousands of new people use than we existing residents will save? New construction is notoriously profligate with water use, how much water will all the new construction use?
I am not happy having my native fescue back lawn die and showering now only once a week, while around the corner, a new giant hotel (22,000 square feet of hotel replacing 3500 square feet of retail business space) on El Camino and Arastradero that dwarfs the surrounding neighborhood, will have guests using far more water than probably my whole neighborhood will be able to save.
A recent article in the Daily Post stated that the rainfall this year was only one inch below normal. The last two years were not far below normal, either . Nothing like the Great Drought of the nineties, where there was very little rainfall at all for seven long years, or the drought of 1976, when the rainfall was less than half of normal.
What has changed is all the businesses and new developments in Palo Alto--I.e., people who commute here to work and use up so much water while they are here. Not to mention the landscaping that gets daily watering while residents have forgone vegetable gardens and showers!
Very blunt comment - I would love to see a "water conscious landscape" that does not look like a field of weeds or pretend "streams" of rock. To those in the business of plants, if we had options that were green, bloomed for a significant period of time and did not only look good with very contemporary architecture, you would have more people on board.
With one or two exceptions, that are truly beautiful, water conscious landscaping equals a yard full of plants that look like weeds. And I have yet to see any traditionally styled home or any home with small children that has low water landscaping that is flattering and appropriate to traditional architecture and fun and/or welcoming to small kids.
My green grass and green plants help to keep my home cool and is a pleasant place to sit in the shade as a result. I don't think sitting on a brown lawn surrounded by rocks and dry plants would be as cool as the rocks hold the heat and would make me feel more hot. Children can't play on rocks, they play on grass. Dogs like to romp on grass, not dirt.
Our streets are full of city owned trees that homeowners are expected to keep well watered.
California farmers grow rice, alfalfa and other high water use crops. Where are the farmers being told to reduce high water use crops? Why are the city parks saturated with water so that they could be described as waterlogged?
Why isn't California investing in desalination plants? Why isn't there a city wide gray water program? Why must it be homeowners who are expected to reduce water use when all around us there is flagrant water wastage?
I will do my part, but the real problem is that we have no innovative ways to reuse gray water or take water from the ocean that is right along the length of our State.
I am concerned about homes that are de-watering new construction. That is the water table that is being drained which causes a sinking in land in the surrounding area. I live on fill. Fill is not the greatest soil for your garden. It is now turning into an adobe brick. And the water table is what is holding this all up.
No- it is not well water but is critical to maintain the ground level the houses were built on. The planning department should be recognizing that the ground water is critical for most of PA.
I am concerned because I have a recently planted city tree in my front yard and the city instructions are that I am responsible for watering this tree and keeping it going for several years. It takes quite a lot of water. Street trees are protected, by the way.
In addition, my property has lush landscaping which is beneficial to the city home values (along with many others' properties, of course!) Compare with some other cities and ponder this aspect of Palo Alto.
We need to store more water in California and not snap to insisting that all let their lawns and landscaping die. Those installing new landscaping, including commercial, should certainly research more drought tolerant ideas for planting. But forcing me to rip out two lawns would be a major loss to my property and the size of the space does not lead to easy replacement planting ideas.
I passed a new home construction at 1950 Newell Road. This has a very deep hole with a tractor still digging. The workmen were running water to get dirt off the street. They said it was "good water".
That is a topic for tomorrow night - residents are going to get penalized for watering their plants while the city is approving construction that requires much clearing of water in the ground table. This ground table water is what is watering the street trees. If you pull out the ground water then you will have collapsing land in the surrounding area.
Also - the dam next to HWY 156 to Los Banos is sending water to the southland, Los Angeles and the southland are exercising no restriction on water use.
There is much wrong here at both the city level, county level, and state level.
The papers are only talking about the immediate area but our water is coming from the other side of the state.
What is needed are more dams in California. When was the last one built? Not anytime within memory.
We need to be able to store the water we do get, so we don't run out when we don't get enough.
@resident 1 - the house at 1950 Newell is also dewatering their basement area. You can't see the pipe well, it goes under the sidewalk right into the street drain. There is also a house on Barbara (a couple block east) that is dewatering their basement.
"I am concerned because I have a recently planted city tree in my front yard and the city instructions are that I am responsible for watering this tree and keeping it going for several years. It takes quite a lot of water. Street trees are protected, by the way."
In the meantime, the City could have saved the decades-old 100 established trees at Maybell orchard, that yet live without any watering, along with the dozen ancient native oaks on that property, as parkland, for little more than the cost of what they are spending to put in new drapes and unnecessary gizmos at City hall. This is what we get from a Council that has done nothing but let development interests pull our City around by the nose for far too long, considering nothing else but densifying our town, ignoring infrastructure, resources, and quality of life.
I just heard today on the news that despite calls for reducing water use 20%, overall use has gone up 1%. Surprise, surprise. Nowhere did they mention looking at how the new development fits in the picture. I don't want to be asked to sacrifice anymore until the Governor calls a moratorium on new development until the drought is over, and until Cities are given tools for assessing the infrastructure and resources impacts of state policies that promote overdevelopment, giving Cities choices when cumulative impacts go exponential.
Given the price of produce, it is actually less expensive to pay the extra money to water a VERY small vegetable garden than to buy these veggies retail, even at a farmer's market. I have tomatoes, peppers, corn, peas, squash, basil and Rosemary from May to November, and don't have to worry about price or availability, pesticides, or hepatitis ( from organic produce).
Residential water use is not the problem--corporate agriculture uses over 60% of the water.
Speaking of dewatering an aquifer, when Larry Page's house was being built at the end of Waverley Oaks ( on a one-acre lot, no less), draining the aquifer beneath the property in order to build a basement took TWO WHOLE YEARS! A long pipe went from the back of the property, down Bryant Ave, and into a storm drain next to the Baptist Church on the corner of Calif Ave and Bryant. Talk about a sick waste--but NO ONE said anything.
I can see the impact of the water table being siphoned off on my property and those around me. The property is shifting in relation to where the underground water table is collapsing. Also, the trees are sending up the root systems above ground. I see a root sticking up - start to pull at it, and soon there is a whole network of roots coming up. I am not only in plant control - but also root excavation control. The amount of time devoted to this amazes me.
I now have cracks in the garage concrete and can see the slope.
I remember a house we had on Colorado Ave. - beautifully done inside and outside. A crack would open in the family room then close up again. We patched that and sold the house - this was a regular house on a wood frame - not an Eichler.
If the water table in north PA is being siphoned off for large home construction then large, expensive homes will have the same problem.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
WUE makes out-of-state tuition more affordable
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 2,602 views
Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,393 views
Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,194 views
Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,687 views
In Defense of "Incivility"
By Douglas Moran | 17 comments | 1,605 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.