Weekly protecting Holman
Original post made by Rupert of henzau, Midtown, on Jun 6, 2014
The above thread was completely removed and the following comment was posted:
"[Post removed due to potentially false and defamatory statements.]"
I read the post before it was removed. The comments posted were from a couple of Daily Post articles in yesterday's and today's paper regarding ms Holman.
The articles contain comments from Ms Holman and a developer. Not sure why the thread was removed.
Will the weekly be looking into the matter. Does the weekly have evidence that the claims made by the Post are false? Seems that ms Holman was quite open about the matter and reported the matter on her disclosure forms. What is the weekly claiming it is false and defamatory?
I, for one, am not surprised by the actions of the weekly .
Ike's Place makes another go at Stanford; Palo Alto outpost stalls
By Elena Kadvany | 9 comments | 2,681 views
Groundhog Day: Dis-embellishing a Multilevel Proxy
By Douglas Moran | 2 comments | 414 views