Town Square

Post a New Topic

Three top Palo Alto officials to get raises

Original post made on Mar 21, 2014

Days after Palo Alto officials approved pay raises for the lowest-paid city workers, a City Council committee has proposed spreading the rewards to three employees in the top tier -- City Manager James Keene, City Attorney Molly Stump and City Clerk Donna Grider.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 21, 2014, 6:37 PM

Comments (21)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Who do they really work for
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 21, 2014 at 7:55 pm

Donna Grider deserves a better raise and a medal. Molly Stump and James Keene would get no more than pink slips and a don't-let-the-door-hit-you-on-your-way-out-the-door if there was any justice (and their performance was based on how well they worked for our residents).


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Who do they really work for
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 21, 2014 at 7:57 pm

Gennady,
You do a great job covering the City, but could you please publish a complete story on the organizational structure and what positions makes what so we can all see where our money is going and what is being done with it?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by David
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 21, 2014 at 7:58 pm

Doesn't Jame Keene get a raise every year regardless?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by pat
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 22, 2014 at 10:00 am

@Who do they really work for: The org charts and salaries of all city employees is in the city budget at
Web Link

Also see: Web Link

The Daily Post publishes salaries of all employees of Palo Alto and other Bay Area cities. Unfortunately, it's not online.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by common sense
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 22, 2014 at 10:54 am

Gennady, the city manager's total compensation (including benefits) is more than $264,488. It's more like $360,000, however that does not factor in the partially city paid for house, property taxes, etc. that the city manager receives.

Also it's would be helpful to include comparisons to other cities in the Peninsula/Silicon Valley of similar population; it appears that the City Manager salary is in the same proximity as Cupertino (population 59,000) and Redwood City (76,000) city managers.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by pat
a resident of Midtown
on Mar 22, 2014 at 11:04 am

> "We know who pays staff: us. But we're never sure who they're working for."

How ironic that City Attorney Molly Stump is up for a 9% raise. Web Link

She was part of the secret dealings with Arrillaga over the 7.7-acre land sale. Web Link

She also stonewalled multiple PRA requests regarding the Arrillaga project for 3 months, when the law requires a response within 10 days.

Apparently, this is the kind of behavior Council finds worthy of reward.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wayne Martin
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53 am

> She also stonewalled multiple PRA requests regarding the Arrillaga
> project for 3 months, when the law requires a response within 10 days.

is this well documented? Did anyone make a formal complaint to the City Council about this lack of response by the City Attorney?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by neighbor
a resident of another community
on Mar 22, 2014 at 1:01 pm

Top Palo Alto managers who must deal with constant uninformed and extremely hostile onslaughts from citizens (and local political candidates to-be) in several PA neighborhoods --- and don't resign early for mental health reasons --- deserve their hazard pay.

We have lots of community debate in my community also, but it is not a blood sport. In fact, many times the neighborhoods get compromise or even different proposals from the city officials.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wayne Martin
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Mar 22, 2014 at 1:14 pm

> Top Palo Alto managers who must deal with constant uninformed and
> extremely hostile onslaughts from citizens

What makes you believe that everyone who deals with "top city officials" is uninformed, ignorant and hostile?

And could you please give some examples?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by disconnect
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 22, 2014 at 2:26 pm



What a disconnect for me. I think James Keene should leave, and be replaced by somebody better for Palo Alto. Yet he is getting a raise.

Is this a union job? A cost of living adjustment based on comparative data? A raise usually implies reward for doing something better. Where is the performance report which justifies this?

What is the standard for this job, and is it a life position? For example, what would he have to do to get fired or encouraged to leave? Apparently, he can do no wrong.

I would have hoped that by not giving him a raise, he could have gone elsewhere.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wha?
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 22, 2014 at 3:15 pm

The Union doesn't get a retroactive COLA, but Keene does. Just saying. What a rip off. .25 million a year, subsidized housing and free health care benefits and he needs a raise. The raise might be for stomping down the Union. Those employees are seeing their first pay increase in almost 7 years, with more taken out of each check now than 7 years ago as they pay for more of the health care and retirement benefits. Keene and cohorts haven't given up squat. Disgusting.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by JO
a resident of College Terrace
on Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 pm

I checked the City's web site to try to see the agenda of the Council Appointed Officers Committee meeting, but it wasn't posted. I did see that the March 24 City Council agenda lists approval of pay raises for the three positions mentioned in the article as items 8a, 8b and 8c on the consent calemdar, so I understand how the Palo Alto Weeklyfinally became alerted to the pay raises.So much for "notice to the public."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by @PAFreePress
a resident of another community
on Mar 23, 2014 at 5:49 am

Wayne Martin Good point Ms. Stump has a long history of stonewalling CPRA processess on transparency and open government. Don't bother complaining to city council your complaints will go nowhere. We recommend filing a California State Bar complaint. This will hold her accountable and if appropriate, sanctions will be imposed swiftly. See Califirnia State Bar website for furtrer details

Mark


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anciana
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Mar 24, 2014 at 11:06 am

All of these raises were said to be for a 1023 date. I guess that means they are retroactive? Wow.

It seems to me that all of the Palo Alto city workers are very well paid, although I can't compare them to those of other nearby cities. I have a friend who was able to retire at a very early age (in his fifties or early sixties) who travels every year to another country, has remodeled his house with no apparent pain, and seems to live a very good life -- all this on retirement pay? I don't want our city to be ungenerous,and I have long been a supporter of unions, but only of those unions who work for corporations. Government unions have way too much power.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anciana
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Mar 24, 2014 at 11:07 am

Ooops. I meant 2013, of course.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by ken again
a resident of Professorville
on Mar 24, 2014 at 2:35 pm

Notice how the survey claiming everyone loves Palo Alto comes out just a little before the pay raises?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by OldMan
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Mar 24, 2014 at 2:52 pm

Now I know,
What is "job well done" recognition according our city council, that manifest in a 9 % raise for a city lawyer who should represent Palo Alto.
Secret meeting and multiple site visit few Council member so the disclosure requirement can be ignored in a potential 7.7 acres illegal land sale, as well a closed door meeting with billionaire for a development plan that would require major re-zoning for the potential Tower Buildings, not to mention the Maybell Ave fiasco. All these great work was in secret without required notices for Palo Alto residents "now that is a lawyer" who deserves a raise under the phony claim of retention. For heaven sake let her goooooo and hire a recent graduate with a significantly lower pay. She / he would do a professional job according city charters

The City does not have funding for a new Police Building, infrastructure but we will reward the City manager for a "job well done" in the Mitchell park library construction debacle or ordering a money wasting Maybell referendum vote, etc. etc

Wake-up Palo Alto, The City Council election is coming,


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kelly
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Mar 24, 2014 at 4:46 pm

I'm STUMPED. Do I get a raise?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mark
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 24, 2014 at 5:16 pm

If the City Attorney stonewalled requests for public records, report her to the civil grand jury and read California Government Code section 3060 about what tha grand jury could do.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by CresentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 25, 2014 at 12:48 pm

Why? No!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Amy
a resident of Palo Alto Hills
on Mar 26, 2014 at 10:31 pm

Looked up Government Code section 3060 and following. It does provide STUMP REMOVAL.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Best High Dives to Watch the Game
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,547 views

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,424 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,111 views

The Future of our Parks: Public Workshops this Week
By Cathy Kirkman | 0 comments | 548 views

NO MEAT ATHLETE Workout/Running Group
By Max Greenberg | 2 comments | 429 views