Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jan 22, 2014
First they get the approval to build and then they sue. This is what's wrong with the judicial system. Job security I guess.
Perhaps it's more about the company I keep, but I only hear the term "capricious" from legal counsel or Seinfeld reruns. Precisely what is "unfair" about a city placing strict requirements on developers (a label that has become an obscenity in Palo Alto discussions) to address community concerns, and how are concerns such as affordability "unrelated to the project". Oh, I see. The actual people of the city are not related to the concerns of the developer. All right, good thing we cleared that up.
Oh goody! More people. More traffic! Can't wait!
Why is the developer suing now? Didn't the developer enter into an agreement with the City on BMR in exchange for permission to build this complex?
If so, is it fair to really "change your mind" and say that quid pro quo isn't acceptable to the developer?
This is worth watching
I'd rather have the bowling alley than 2 dozen more condos. More legal fees, blah, blah, blah. If only the City Council had said 'no' in the first place....
- Perhaps they will get the message and say 'no' the next time they get a proposal from a developer who just wants to get rich with no regard for the community...
No more "affordable housing" in Palo Alto. [Portion removed.]
When these were sold at 40% below market rate the additional cost was added to the remaining houses in the usual Palo Alto wealth redistribution scheme. And now, forever, we have to pay 40% of the monthly dues for these 4 houses or another $10,000/year subsidy.
Thanks for nothing ,City Council and other socialists promoting these schemes.
The sheer greed of our local developers rears its ugly head again. While it might be argued that the burden of providing affordable housing (and parking) should be on the shoulders of those building more office space to lure more workers to Palo Alto, this does smack a bit of 'biting the hand that fed you'.
The sheer greed of our local developers rears its ugly head again. While it might be argued that the burden of providing affordable housing (and parking) should fall mostly on the shoulders of the developers building more office space to lure more workers to Palo Alto, this smacks a bit of 'biting the hand that fed you'.
Let nothing stand in the way of unbounded greed! They agreed in 2009 in order to get their permits, but now it's too much to ask. I hope the judge reams them out.....again.
Did this builder get density or other concessions as a result of the affordable housing?
Isnt this the developer who just set a precedent by beating our city attorney in the ca supreme court over whether this was a fee or an exaction?
Developers should not have this option!!!
yuppies outta town! get outta the country!
The city made a demand for LIH that has been found to be illegal.
Why not sue?
It will be expensive to rip those out and rebuild with LUXURY units.
Best laws that money can buy.
Agree to terms to get a project approved and then whine (and sue) about being forced to agree under duress, all over 4 BMR units. Not once, but twice. Have these people no shame or sympathy for those who need affordable housing--which is most of us. I used to view Classic Communities favorably. No longer.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Teavana Palo Alto closes
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,974 views
What Freshmen Should be Thinking About College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 17 comments | 3,083 views
Sometimes the Rules Go Out the Window
By Cheryl Bac | 5 comments | 1,898 views
Waiting on the Edge of Death
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 1,448 views
Clarifying the Process of Canonization
By Nick Taylor | 1 comment | 1,359 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.