Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Nov 13, 2013
Anyone else think the first sentence in this article is just trolling for whiners?
I don't love every single piece of public art in this city, but I do enjoy enough of it to want to keep this program going. It does make the streets more interesting, especially if you are a pedestrian and can stop to study the individual pieces.
I am all for the more art concept - and perhaps we could reinstall the wooden Friends that used the sit facing Embarcadero and got put in storage a few years ago?
This is great news! Public art is wonderful. I particularly love murals; but, unlike a lot of people, I like "Go Mama". Art is so subjective. She makes me smile!
This shakedown by the publics arts commission (which is driving this turkey) is reflective of the mindset of our current city council. No doubt that it will also contribute to the mindset of the elites that PC zoning will be supported, because they like to make a statement about "art" (whatever that is)...and such "art" is considered to be a public benefit.
This turkey is a tax, period.
Palo Alto and Stanford have one of the best collections of public sculpture in the world. It is one of the things that distinguishes this place and is an endeavor that ought to recognized as a high value to the community. Continuing to support it is a wise move by the City Council.
Oh, I forgot this is the Town Square forum. I'm reminded that at one point we had an opportunity to have a sculpture by Bruce Beasley at the end of California Avenue by the train tracks. He's only one of the most well-regarded contemporary living sculptors, with work in major collections around the world. "But a fountain would be nicer...."
Cue the "this is a waste of our money" haters.....
>Cue the "this is a waste of our money" haters.....
Include me in this group. Would someone please provide a single example of PA public art "that distinguishes this place and is an endeavor that ought to recognized as a high value to the community"? There are couple of pieces that I rather like, most though are trivial, austere, cynical, etc. On balance, it is all a waste of taxpayer money.
Self-defined 'artists' should not be given access to the taxpayers' money. It is a train wreck. And it is a tax, period.
If Palo Alto needs to become more beautiful/artistic or do more to remain that way establish zoning and rules that are always enforced. If you don't believe workable regulations can be agreed to, find a voting minority to pay for it... oh that's what the 1% for art is doing.
I agree with C Laughton that self-defined artists and art lovers should not be given access to the taxpayers' money.
Very exciting for Palo Alto. Important to make this City an interesting destination, beyond tech companies. Let tech bring them to town, but have the museums, art center and public art make them want to come back.
Of course the concept of a public art program is good. The problem in
Palo Alto is the execution. Similarly "design review" is good but look at the execution by the ARB. If The Cheesecake Factory on University Ave is
approved, do we have "design review"? Or 801 Alma? No. If we approve
"Go Mama" for California Ave do we have public art? No. We have something
else on California Ave. It does not qualify as public art or as artistic. The notion of "subjectivity" has boundaries and cannot be used for blanket approval of literally anything.
The assertion in the staff report that "Palo Alto wants to preserve its sense of its own history and destiny" is an absolute joke in the context of what has taken place here in the last ten years in terms of the destruction
of the City and its character.
The continuation of 'Art in Inappropriate Places' will continue. Can the art commission at least limit the wierd art generated by LSD and other hallucinogens?
" ….create new ways to express ourselves as a community."
Hows about expressing ourselves by creating two beautiful landscaped traffic circles in College Terrace?
Certainly landscaping is defined as an art.
We were promised landscaped circles when we voted them in……
If this amounts to a Tax as other posters have suggested at least let the taxpayers have a say in how the funds are allocated!
The traffic circles on Everett Downtown have never been landscaped-
no tiles, nothing.
Quote from article:
"According to the staff report, the new ordinance "may generate as much as $2 million for public art in the first three years of implementation."
!!! hope springs eternal for DTN/DTS traffic circles as well!
Palo Alto has vocal art critics for a reason! When ever the Palo Alto Art Commission wanders about town, it periodically squats and leaves behind what it calls "public art".
I am deeply offended that I am confused with "public art" in Palo Alto.
As a professional fine artist since 1996, I find it incredibly crude and backwards that some here say to not give some of tax payers money towards this art program. Art is such an important part of who we are as humans. It helps to enrich and give life to a community. I do agree that the art chosen should be more beauty enhancing with some thought-provoking accents rather than chosen soley as any provocative catalyst. Take a look at Scottsdale, AZ's public art program to see this arrangement really being an enhancer.
I am an artist who has worked on several public works throughout the west. I see how it has enhanced the community. But I believe the work should be chosen not to "stand out" provocatively, but utilyzed to beautify and enhance our lives.
>As a professional fine artist since 1996, I find it incredibly crude and backwards that some here say to not give some of tax payers money towards this art program.
Really, Kelly? As a professional(and amateur) citizen in Palo Alto for decades, I find the notion of tax extortion to provide for so-called 'art', usually very unpopular with the 'nonprofessional artists' to be arrogant elitism.
Please name a few public art works in PA that you think "helps to enrich and give life to a (our) community". Moreover, why should such choices be up to the Arts Commission? An example is the fountain at the end of California Ave. Why is that not replaced with a nice and peaceful fountain, instead of being held hostage to an elitist choice?
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Are you taking a Gap Year?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 9 comments | 2,109 views
Palo Alto's Cafe Pro Bono reopens after fire
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 930 views
Magical Bridge Playground
By Cheryl Bac | 6 comments | 746 views
Follow-up to a Love Script
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 654 views
By Sally Torbey | 6 comments | 382 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.