Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Oct 30, 2013
> Nearly 60 percent fewer plastic checkout bags than last year were
> found during a September Coast Clean-up day at Adobe Creek,
> according to the city.
Without providing the public the actual number of bags found, offering a percentage by itself is meaningless. This kind of behaviour on the part of the City demonstrates a lack of transparency, and even goes far enough to support a charge of dishonesty on the part of those promoting this ban.
This bag ban is bogus.
Thank goodness the scourge of plastic bags is finally being addressed. Thank you city leaders! Indeed, your impressive percentage decreases make my heart soar.
Next up - take-out coffee cups! Thank goodness we have our priorities straight out here.
I don't get the plastic bag ban. Is it to eliminate plastic waste or prevent bags from ending up in the waterways? Since supermarkets have stopped providing plastic bags, we now have to buy them to use as trashcan liners. As for the second reason, the only time I've had a plastic bag fly away on me was when I started saving plastic bags in the truck of my car. One time, I popped upon the trunk and a gust of wind sent my plastic bag flying away.
If Joe is so interested in the numbers rather than %, he could call the phone number in the article and get the info. Too many people seem only interested in criticizing rather than illuminating.
> If Joe is so interested in the numbers rather than %
What good is the media, if all they do is post telephone numbers for people to get information. Clearly having thousands of people call the City, or other news sources, for information that should have been in any articles about something that is supposed to be newsworthy makes no sense.
All it would take is for the Weekly to ask: "so, how many bags did you find this time?" How hard could that be? One question asked by the reporter, and then everyone would know. If the City refused to give that number--then it would not be hard to ask: "why not?"
As it turns out, the City did provide the basic information on its web-site--
Approximately 350 plastic bags were found in Palo Alto's lower watershed in 2012 from two creek clean up events and a one-month bag sighting tally
The idea that the City could only find 350 bags in its monitoring area during all of 2012 makes this whole restriction on our basic freedoms outrageous. 60% of a zero is zero. 60% of 350 is also basically zero.
The article does not provide the basic information, and the Council failed to ask even basic questions of the staff who promoted this silliness.
This article did not provide the basic information needed to understand that this whole effort by the City was unneeded, and incredibly dishonest!
Why do I get the feeling that any number of bags reported would have Joe feeling outraged! ;-)
Now when I go shopping in the produce aisle I give thanks that there are still plastic bags to put my vegetables in. There are times when a plastic bag works, and works well. Knowing how filthy and germy most of our supermarkets are and the people who go to them, their kids, and occasionally their dogs, I don't want anything I buy to touch the baskets (that never seemed to get cleaned) or the belts - best is as little as possible.
Plastic bags are appropriate at some times. I don't mind paying for them or paper bags if necessary to do what must be done to clean them up or pay to avoid problems they cause, but let's not go crazy. I'm not sure a paper to-go bag is going to perform the same as a plastic bag when I go to get Chinese take out, particularly if there is liquid involved.
What's next, a paper bag when your kid goes to buy a goldfish, or carrying it home in your cupped hands?
Because of stupid laws like this, I have to BUY MORE PLASTIC bags to put my trash in.
Stupid politicians with feel good laws.
Us bicyclists and hikers don't need the printed numbers to know that these tallies are bogus. Spotting plastic shopping bags along roadside gullies, creeks, and trails is rare now and was rare before the ban. This article could have cut to the chase and noted how these bans are driven by a state zero-waste initiative.
I was driving on highway 85 a week or so ago and followed a trash truck (not a Palo Alto one), there was a steady stream of bags and other small waste coming out of the back. I suspect this is where a lot of the litter comes from that ends in the Bay and creeks.
I find this to be unfortunate. Especially with prepared food, there are times when you need a plastic bag to transport items adequately. May the soup carry-out spill all over the back seat of every council member who voted for this bill and may it quickly soak through their paper bag leaving a lasting smell in their car. Perhaps then they will learn there are practical uses to plastics.
Egad, Americans can be such a bunch of [portion removed] whiners.
Most of the world gets by without single use plastic bags. Deal with it.
And besides any zero waste initiative is the fact that these bags contribute to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
But paper is worse from a life cycle perspective than plastic. Why not charge for all bags (preferably more for paper) instead of banning them.
@ Justin - it is obvious these aren't rational decisions. It is just feel good nonsense..
What really annoys me is that plastic bags are not just single use bags. I have several around my home which are from stores long gone and are in use for various purposes of storage. I need plastic bags for kids to bring home wet swim things from school pe to protect whatever else is in their backpacks. We use plastic bags to keep the saddle dry when bikes have to be parked outside in the rain. We use plastic bags for returning borrowed items so that the bag doesn't have to be returned to us. The Palo Alto Weekly and other newspapers need to be in plastic bags to keep them dry in wet weather. Dry Cleaning needs to be covered in plastic bags. I use plastic bags in the car for when hiking and we end up with muddy shoes that need to be removed and put in a bag to keep the car clean. I like to be able to put my wet umbrella in a plastic bag when carrying it around or returning to the car. Plastic bags are extremely useful when camping or for a day at the beach. They are also very useful for packing when traveling to keep shoes and similar things which may be dirty from dirtying the clean things.
All these things need plastic bags and now we need to buy plastic bags for these uses. One time a trash bag was used for stuff that needed to be returned to someone and it ended up in the trashcan because that is what it looked like - fortunately it was spotted before the trash can was taken away!
I begrudge these bans, modest charges to make us think if we really need one is not too bad, but banning them makes no sense to me.
I was out of town most of the summer and was surprised when I returned to find that along with the plastic bag ban having gone into affect, paper bags were no longer available unless I was willing to pay $.10 per bag for them. I'm all for eliminating plastic bags, but why the charge for paper bags and who gets this money? I'm happy to get into the habit of bringing in my own cloth bags for groceries. I can plan for that since I know I will indeed be buying something at the store. But it's a different story downtown. I never know when I might stop into a retail shop or drugstore to make a purchase and, because I resent being charged for a bag to place that unexpected purchase into, I end juggling jars and tissue wrapped goods out the door and down the street. That certainly doesn't make me want to spend additional time downtown. Have I missed something? Why the new charge for paper bags? I must have missed the small print when the discussion to eliminate plastic bags was going on.
Whaa! Whaa! What a bunch of babies! I am shocked that, in this day and age, in this supposedly well-educated city, so many people are upset about environmental progress.
This is what happens when a bunch of book-smart individuals with little common sense create laws.
I bought take-out Chinese food this evening. Luckily the food was in a plastic bag, because the containers leaked into the bag and not all over me or my car seat. If it had been paper, my car seat would have been a mess. What are these restaurants supposed to use now? Will they end up losing business?
In the past, I reused the plastic bags from any restaurant, grocery store, merchant, etc...Most people I know do the same.
>> because the containers leaked into the bag and not all over me or my car seat. If it had been paper, my car seat would have been a mess. What are these restaurants supposed to use now?
That was what I was ready to get all upset about ... but I read this which seems to say for liquids plastic bags can still be used.
>> Implementation of the ordinance began in 2009 in grocery stores and was expanded to all retail establishments in July. It still allows plastic bags without handles to be used to hold individual containers of soups or stews if the container itself isn't enough to prevent spilling.
Is it true that restaurants can still use plastic bags for food that might leak?
[Post removed due to deletion of referenced comment.]
Hey all! Not a fan of these bans certainly...creeping environmentalism that only leads to more unnecessary laws and restrictions on more and more freedoms is all they really are...but just wanted to let those of you who still want/need these bags that they can be had for pretty cheap prices on Amazon. Just do a search for plastic bags, and many options will appear. Cases run from as little as $15 for 500 or so.
Get yourself a case that will last you for a long time, and fly it in the face of these self-righteous politicians and their supporters!
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,238 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 33 comments | 2,231 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,565 views
"the Summit" (CompPlan): Forewarned is Forearmed
By Douglas Moran | 21 comments | 823 views
A quiet moment
By Sally Torbey | 8 comments | 631 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.