Town Square

Post a New Topic

Why to vote yes Different Perspective. all about NIMBYs

Original post made by Baron hackneyed on Oct 11, 2013

Different neighborhoods along the years approved house for the elderly, the is Retirement Properties in downtown, Midtown, Green meadow, etc. etc. The only place that you are not going to find a building to house the elderly in the neighborhood is in the Baron Park. that is NIMBY's written all over it. Last Century that place was another town part of a red light district. Population wise Baron Park has only 10% of the Palo Alto Population. I say we from all the the other neighborhoods vote for the project to shut the Baron Park residents down and show them that real estate interests and keeping only single house residency is not an option for the new generation

Comments (3)

Posted by Sobibor, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Oct 11, 2013 at 1:27 pm

There is a reason why high density housing costs more to insure. According to Allstate insurance and others, there are more parking conflicts, traffic and traffic accidents, assaults, burglaries, etc in high density developments. The risks are greater, the claims are more frequent, thus the rates for homeowner's and renter's policies in such neighborhoods are higher than those in R1 and R2 neighborhoods.

Besides, once an area is zoned, that zoning should remain permanent. Build an R15 development in the appropriate zone!

Mainly, we do not want to bring more crime and traffic into Palo Alto. Look at the crime in other cities with multiple high density developments: Do we really want to be like them?


Posted by curmudgeon, a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 11, 2013 at 2:21 pm

"I say we from all the the other neighborhoods vote for the project to shut the Baron Park residents down and show them that real estate interests and keeping only single house residency is not an option for the new generation"

Translated: "Build it in those NIMBYs' backyard so it doesn't get built in my backyard."


Posted by Craig Laughton, a resident of College Terrace
on Oct 11, 2013 at 2:35 pm

As a proud and content NIMBY, I want to see each and every neighborhood, faced with a major project, to have a secret ballot vote. That is the only way to accurately reflect citizens opinions. Also, these welfare housing projects should be proposed for our elite neighborhoods...it would be good to see what Greg Scharff's stance would be, if the project was proposed for his block.

I will vote "NO" on "D", even though I don't live in Barron Park. The neighborhoods deserve to be respected.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,450 views

Why is doing nothing so difficult?
By Sally Torbey | 7 comments | 1,121 views

Breastfeeding Tips
By Jessica T | 6 comments | 1,011 views

Who Says Kids Donít Eat Vegetables?
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 780 views

Call it a novel: Dirty Love by Andre Dubus III
By Nick Taylor | 1 comment | 267 views