Post a New Topic
Original post made
on May 20, 2011
We just got a call from the PA PD... She has been located an reunited with her family... Great news...!
Just curious why the comment about her being found in her backyard was removed. As a community parent who received the police calls last night, it was unnerving. I would like some followup regarding what really happened and I would also like to know under what circumstances it is appropriate to notify the police that a teenage girl is missing - and then, when calls will go out, etc. I would like to know, so that I can respond accordingly, in action, stress and in case it happens to my kids. (so I think the comment was reasonable). What was the deal?
I saw the comment from qq too and she has a police radio.
I think we have a right to know what happened since we were all notified.
The comment was from a different "qq". The one with the police scanner also puts a link to the twitter feed with the police reports so we know it is the real one.
This girl is known (just from school) by teens in our household. It made us discuss just how important it is for them to let us know where they are and if their plans change. Even in days with cell phones, it is not OK to assume that letting parents know what is going on is not OK. To our teens, it seemed like over-reacting on the part of parents. We were able to pint out that it is worrying and if something dreadful had happened, the police response is best within a couple of hours of knowing of a "kidnapping" rather than a day later.
If nothing else, this should be a discussion starter in the homes of all teens who received the call.
So glad she was found OK and thanks for the opportunity to learn from this.
I'm grateful to live in a community where the police are willing to act immediately when something like a missing child is reported and am also glad that they will activate the emergency system in this way. The sooner the word gets out to the community after a child goes missing, the more likely it is that we can avert a tragedy. If, once in a while, it means that there is a "false alarm", then that's a price I am more than willing to pay. Thank you to the police. I also agree that it provides a teaching moment to remind our kids to keep us aware of their plans so that we can keep the worries to a minimum.
Is that what it was then, a false alarm? That's ok, but it would be nice if that was officially confirmed.
I'm still interested in guidelines, as well.
For my kids, they are generally too young (not that independent) for this to be much of a teaching opportunity.
This feels a bit "off".
My family has in the past called the police to report a 13 year old missing and the response from them then was, "Kids run off all the time, call us again if he's not back in a day or 2".
I'm glad this story turned out ok, but I also can't shake the feeling that someone with connections had to pull some strings to make these phone calls go out when they did (so soon).
Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but our tax dollars had to pay for these calls.
In this day and age of lawsuits, I doubt that someone told you that.
Glad the kid was found safe...good reminder for us to have a plan worked out with our kids.
It is worth knowing a few things legally about missing persons. First, there is no "waiting period" until you can report it in. In fact, don't waste time. A few things by law: (i) a report must be initiated by the agency whenever a person is reported missing; (ii) the report must be accepted without delay; (iii) it must be accepted regardless of jurisdiction; and (iv) it must be given priority over reports of non-emergency property-related crimes. If the missing person is "at risk" a Be On Lookout (BOL) broadcast must be made without delay. Legally anyone under 16 is automatically at risk. At risk can also be elderly, mentally ill, suicidal, etc. The agency must also notify the missing persons database within 4 hours of an at-risk missing person. The California DOJ is also notified within 24 hours for at-risk. So if your child or family member goes missing, make sure you understand how they may qualify as at risk to have their case dealt with appropriately.
This event plus the case of the Danville teen who jumped off the Golden Gate Bridge this week after a similar missing teen alert shows that we must take every notice of a teen not being where supposed to be very seriously.
I think the high schools should alert parents if their child is missing from school during the school day, not at 6.00 pm when the dialer automatically alerts families. Elementary schools contact families within an hour if the child has not turned up at school. Leaving it until evening is too late.
Been missing my daughter for months and east Palo Alto police department. Not doing nothing to help...
Agree with Resident. Attendance is all electronic now so the attendance office can easily see who is not attending their first class. I wrote to Superintendent Skelly regarding this and he thinks this is a safe town and we don't need to worry about students disappearing so there is no need for the employees to do extra work.
I agree with you and Resident, too. I have found it really disturbing to have calls that my child was not in school after a whole day when said child was in school, just late for first period. Very unnerving to consider what happens in an emergency. There is no reason they can't notify immediately via the system.
(Do you know why the PA libraries notify you two days before your books are due instead of two weeks after? A long argument about it with Paula Simpson - not all of these administrators understand the technology well enough to know it's no big deal to change. Please persist in your complaint, Parent!)
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Teavana Palo Alto closes
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,729 views
What Freshmen Should be Thinking About College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 16 comments | 2,501 views
Sometimes the Rules Go Out the Window
By Cheryl Bac | 5 comments | 1,809 views
Clarifying the Process of Canonization
By Nick Taylor | 1 comment | 1,315 views
Waiting on the Edge of Death
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 964 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.