Palo Alto Weekly

News - October 25, 2013

Around Town

SIGNS OF THE TIMES ... With just days left until the big vote, the two sides in Palo Alto's bitter Measure D debate are now swapping a familiar Election Day accusation: stolen lawn signs. Cheryl Lilienstein, one of the leaders of the campaign opposing the measure, publicly leveled a series of accusations this week against the "Yes on D" camp. In an email to the City Council, the Palo Alto Housing Corporation (whose residential project on Maybell Avenue is the subject of Measure D) and the Police Department, Lilienstein said she received four separate complaints of "Vote Against D" yard signs being stolen last weekend on Maybell. "Please exercise your wisdom and authority as leaders and request that your volunteers calm down," Lilienstein wrote. She received a response within three hours from Councilwoman Gail Price, who like Lilienstein lives in Barron Park but who unlike her supports the measure. Sign stealing, she noted, is not limited to the measure's proponents. "I had two signs stolen from my front yard on Maybell — as one example," Price wrote. Another victim of sign thievery was Candice Gonzalez, executive director of the Housing Corporation. "Please note that many Yes on D signs have been stolen as well, including in my front yard," Gonzalez wrote.

DIGITALLY SPEAKING ... When Palo Alto leaders talk about building a "leading digital city," they're usually talking about open data and high-speed Internet, not flashy billboards. This week will be an exception. The City Council is scheduled to consider on Monday the latest staff proposal for raising revenues to fix outdated infrastructure — a digital billboard that would go up on a city-owned parcel along U.S. Highway 101, near the end of Colorado Avenue. If approved, the digital billboard could net the city between $700,000 and $1 million annually, according to a staff estimate. The exact amount would depend on the number and size of the ads, as well as the number of "flips" the city wishes to reserve for its own purposes. City officials have already consulted numerous advertisers who confirmed local suspicions that the site is "indeed a very desirable location and could generate premium advertising revenues" and would net about 325,000 daily views. Staff notes that other cities, including East Palo Alto, San Jose and Sacramento, either already have or are in the midst of setting up similar digital message centers. If the council agrees, staff will develop a request for proposals and ultimately select a firm that would shepherd the billboard through the permitting process and help the city land the advertising clientele. The community is also expected to have a say. According to a report from the office of City Manager James Keene, staff intends to seek a "high level of community engagement" before unveiling a more detailed concept for the digital billboard. The city's partnering firm would help develop the community-engagement plan, according to the report. A more refined concept could be in place by the middle of next year, with possible implementation taking place within a year or two.

ART MEETS TECH...Artistic techies, rejoice. You'll soon be able to browse the entire Palo Alto public art collection online, on a pleasing-to-the-eye database. Public Art Manager Elise DeMarzo showed the Public Art Commission a test version of the website at an Oct. 17 meeting. It's not totally set in stone, but as it is now, on the left hand side of the site, visitors will be able to search by artwork title, artists' names and discipline (sculpture, painting, etc.). On the right hand side are two slowly scrolling columns of art "eye candy" (photos of artworks). Hover your cursor over the photo and it will pause, and text will appear providing information about the piece of art. Staff also hopes that artists will write descriptions to be posted with each art work. The database will also help staff more efficiently manage the city's art collection, keep track of maintenance, artists' contact information and more. It's part of an overall effort to revamp the city's public art and commission's web pages. "And you thought it would never happen," DeMarzo joked to the commission. The website has been a recurring item on the commission's agenda since at least 2009.

Comments

Posted by EASY TO ACCUSE, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 26, 2013 at 11:41 am

"Cheryl Lilienstein, one of the leaders of the campaign opposing the measure, publicly leveled a series of accusations "

the anti-D group has been very active in hurling accusations (false, I may add) at supporters of measure D, as well as the board and executives of PAHC, the city council.
I now call on Ms Lilienstein to provide her proof that it was the Yes on D people that stole the yard signs. It is easy to accuse people, but I bet you we will not hear a word from Ms Cheryl when one asks for proof.
What is her role in the disappearance of the Yes on D signs???


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 26, 2013 at 3:28 pm

I strongly suggest bored teenagers take the signs. It is the sort of thing they think is funny. They don't realize that others will be accused of stealing the signs. They just think it is a prank.

I don't know this for a fact, I just suggest it because it sounds much more likely than any side stealing the other side's signs.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields