Palo Alto Weekly

News - December 28, 2012

2012: Palo Alto's wild growth spurt

Economic rebound brings wave of proposals for massive developments and a chorus of concerns over their impacts

by Gennady Sheyner

Earlier this month, as Palo Alto's planning commissioners delved into the irksome problem of downtown parking, Commissioner Michael Alcheck made a keen observation: As far as problems go, a wildly popular downtown isn't such a bad problem to have.

"I think we can approach this problem with some level of pride, with some level of appreciation that we've accomplished a success story that other Peninsula cities haven't," Alcheck said at the Dec. 12 meeting.

His comment in many ways encapsulated 2012 in Palo Alto. If 2011 was the year in which the city was washing off the cobwebs from the Great Recession, 2012 was the year in which the city completed its economic rebound and began dealing with the problems of its own success. It was the year in which giant developments began targeting Palo Alto, enraging downtown residents who recall with a mix of nostalgia and anger the good old days when there were ample parking spots outside their homes. It was the year in which high-speed rail an issue that has been enraging the community and engaging the council since 2009 finally receded into the background after state legislators approved in July funding for the line's first segment in Central Valley. And it was also the year in which the city completed its long-awaited Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan and secured enough funding to ensure that the ambitious plan will not lay dormant, like its predecessor.

The city had its share of problems, from residential burglaries to outdated infrastructure, from pension costs that have increased tenfold over the past decade to medical spending that continues to surge. And the City Council had to stifle its usual share of controversies, from animal lovers opposing City Manager James Keene's unpopular proposal to shutter the local animal shelter and a controversial plan to ban vehicle habitation to a community uproar over insufficient parking and the city's back-door negotiations with billionaire developer John Arrillaga over the latter's plan to build a giant office-and-theater complex near the downtown train station.

But aside from the pockets of issue-specific discontents, the mood has generally been bright in Palo Alto. When respondents to the 2012 National Citizen Survey were asked in September to rate the overall "quality of life" in the city, 94 percent gave the city a "good" or "excellent" grade and 88 percent gave the two highest grades to the city's "quality of services."

As Keene noted in his annual wrap-up presentation, the impact has been particularly significant when it comes to economic development and emergency preparedness. In the former category, 67 percent gave the city a "good" or "excellent" rating, up from 52 percent in 2011. In the latter category, the number went up from 64 percent to 73 percent. Keene said it was gratifying to see residents recognize the city's improvement in areas that have seen a particular council focus in recent years.

"We're a small city and we have a medium-size staff, but the volunteer efforts of the council and community and the work of our staff stacks up with anybody, really," Keene said.

While some fiscal challenges remain, it was the topic of growth that dominated City Council meetings in 2012 not the worst subject to deal with at a time when the rest of the nation is still experiencing a sluggish economic recovery, a fragile real estate market and stubborn unemployment rate that hovered at around 7.6 percent near the year's end. In Palo Alto, sales-tax revenues have risen for the third straight year (going from $18 million in fiscal year 2010 to a projected $23.4 in 2013, which began on July 1), housing prices are near an all-time high and the unemployment rate is 4.2 percent. Other revenue sources are also booming. Hotel-tax revenues in Palo Alto have risen from $6.9 million in 2010 to $9.7 million in 2012. Office vacancies dropped from 5.5 percent in fiscal year 2011 to 2.9 percent in 2012.

The year's most passionate debates stemmed directly from this success. Spring saw a series of tense public hearings over the four-story "Lytton Gateway" building that was proposed for the prominent corner of Alma Street and Lytton Avenue a project the City Council approved in May. In the summer, the council debated an offer from commercial developer Jay Paul to build a large office complex and a new police headquarters near the AOL building on Page Mill Road a proposal that is set to undergo further transformation in 2013. And the biggest proposal of all came in the fall, when the city consultants unveiled Arrillaga's "concept" for transforming a central but long neglected section of downtown into what the city dubbed an "arts and innovation district."

The topic of new developments, particularly downtown, has literally hit close to home for the frustrated residents of Downtown North and Professorville, where residents often talk about a diminishing quality of life. The issue came to a boil with Arrillaga's proposal, which has been negotiated largely out of public view, much to the consternation of local land-use watchdogs and council watchers. On Dec. 3, more than a hundred residents attended a council meeting and dozens blasted the council for taking shortcuts. The council responded by nixing its previous plan to bring the Arrillaga project to the voters and directed staff and consultants to evaluate two other alternatives (in addition to Arrillaga's) as part of a "master plan" for the site at 27 University Ave. By a 7-0 vote (with Larry Klein and Yiaway Yeh not participating), the council agreed that the plan is a bit too ambitious for the community and that it's time to take a step back.

"The best way for us to move toward something that both has a good chance for community support and good design outcomes is to go ahead and invest in this open Palo Alto process," Burt said at the hearing.

The debate over 27 University Ave. carries some shades of the age-old feud between the city's pro-growth "establishment" forces and its slow-growth "residentialists" a conflict that reached its zenith during the 1960s and 1970s. But while the City Council in those days was deeply polarized, today's group speaks largely in unison as it tries to find a sweet spot for downtown growth and strike a perfect balance between protecting the quality of life and encouraging economic growth. In September, Burt was one of several council members to voice enthusiasm for Arrillaga's proposal, which includes a new theater for the award-winning company TheatreWorks and a host of circulation improvements around the downtown transit hub. But even as he supported breaking the 50-foot height barrier for this project, he called on his colleagues to reaffirm the city's general commitment to the height restriction a bedrock provision for those who think the city is growing too fast.

The debate over growth is sure to provoke further debates and disagreements in the years ahead. But even with the issues of parking, traffic and infrastructure high on the agenda, council members were generally sanguine about the past year, with many echoing Alcheck's view that in the grand scheme of things, this is a good time to be Palo Alto. When the City Council convened on Dec. 17 for its final meeting of 2012 and heard City Manager James Keene's "year in review" presentation, the discussion felt like a victory lap.

"I think we did a lot of impactful things this year that are going to make Palo Alto a much better place," Vice Mayor Greg Scharff said after the presentation.

His colleagues agreed, with Greg Schmid (who was re-elected this year) calling Keene's presentation a "great way to end the year" and Pat Burt (who was also re-elected) praising city staff for accomplishing "a great deal in a year." Councilman Sid Espinosa and Mayor Yiaway Yeh, each of whom concluded his fifth and final year on the council, also voiced enthusiasm about the city's recent progress.

"It's exciting to know that as a city, there's immense strength that exists at all levels," Yeh said.

Scharff, who in accordance with local tradition is set to become mayor in January, pointed to several projects that advanced in 2012 and that will impact the city for decades to come. These include the streetscape project on California Avenue, which will reduce lanes and add new plazas, street furniture and outdoor seating to the commercial thoroughfare all part of the city's effort to make the street more like University Avenue or Castro Street in Mountain View. He also cited the dramatic renovation of the Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course, which the council approved in November as part of a regional plan to improve flood protection around San Francisquito Creek. As part of the project, which includes rebuilt levees, a widened channel and an expanded bridge between Palo Alto and East Palo Alto, the golf course will be entirely reconfigured and 10 acres of space will be made available for three athletic fields. More importantly, the project will protect residents in the most vulnerable area downstream of the creek from the type of damage they experienced in February 1998, when flood water drenched neighborhoods in Palo Alto, East Palo Alto and Menlo Park.

A less visible, but no less important, accomplishment touted by Scharff in the final meeting of the year was the council's ability to respond to the economic recession by cutting about $9 million in annual costs between 2009 and 2012 without really impacting the level of services.

"That's really the big win here," Scharff said. "We haven't degraded what we offered to the community in terms of services."

With the city's pension and health care obligations still on the rise, the problem of cutting costs hasn't completely faded away. The council's decision to keep the local animal shelter running places much of the onus for raising funds for the animal operation on a new advocates group, Friends of Palo Alto Animal Shelter. The number of full-time positions in the city's General Fund has dropped by 20 percent over the past decade and the council plans to continue in 2013 its long and painful effort to extract benefit concessions from the city's labor unions.

Even with these challenges on the horizon, 2012 marked a turning point for Palo Alto as the city pivoted from problems of austerity to problems of growth. The latter loomed large as the year came to an end and are likely to tower over other issues as the new year begins.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be emailed at gsheyner@paweekly.com.

Comments

Posted by Not impressed, a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 28, 2012 at 10:22 am

Downtown Palo Alto gets plenty of city attention and tax dollars, but the rest of the city continues to be neglected. Alma and San Antonio are completely overrun by reckless drivers and are totally unsafe to anyone not in a car. The California Ave business district continues to be cut off from the rest of the city by an obsolete car tunnel and a way too tiny tunnel shared by both bicycles and pedestrians. There is a fancy new shopping center being built across San Antonio, but is there any way to get there from Palo Alto without a car?


Posted by Doublespeak, a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 28, 2012 at 10:46 am

>In September, Burt was one of several council members to voice enthusiasm for Arrillaga's proposal, which includes a new theater for the award-winning company TheatreWorks and a host of circulation improvements around the downtown transit hub. But even as he supported breaking the 50-foot height barrier for this project, he called on his colleagues to reaffirm the city's general commitment to the height restriction --
As usual Pat Burt speaks out of both side of his mouth. nice words for residents then he votes for the developer. Very skillful double dealing, again.


Posted by bob, a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 28, 2012 at 11:32 am

All you big shots sit arround patting each other on the back. Get out of your cozy city hall office and look around. look at the streets or the storm drains that over flow every year. and i understand Jim Keean got a 15,000 dollar raise but told everyone else "we need to tighten belts around here". then he and his pals went to china on our tax dollars. On and on and on ........


Posted by Nick Baldo, a resident of Menlo Park
on Dec 28, 2012 at 2:02 pm

Here's to more growth in 2013! Hope the city council doesn't let the reactionary parking enthusiasts dominate next year too, though the chances of this seem slim.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 28, 2012 at 2:36 pm

I have nothing against growth in Palo Alto, if we increase the infrastructure to accommodate it.

We need more schools, more affordable shopping, more hangout space and things for the youth to do, and most importantly we need to move our traffic efficiently around town.

We can't continue to slow down traffic at the same time as building more homes and office space. Traffic needs to get to 101, 280 and back from both residential and business areas in town without bottlenecks and stupid traffic calming such as the SandHill/ECR/Alma bottleneck which causes through traffic to U turn on ECR or use the T & C bottleneck.

We need to improve the shuttle so that it gets the kids to schools and we need to charge a fare to make it fair for all.

We need to increase the number of bike parking places and we need signs telling bikes where these places are. We need pay per hour machines in all city lots in downtown and Cal Ave areas to enable those who want to park all day to do so without having to go to city hall first.

We need to be able to get all residents into their neighborhood schools which should be walking distance without crossing major arteries at the elementary levels. This means that the schools have to be increased where the housing is increasing.

We need to be able to do grocery shopping for an average sized family in Palo Alto without the need to drive out of town and we need the decent sized stores to give us comprehensive choice rather than boutique mini marts. They need decent sized parking lots too so that a week's worth of groceries can be bought and carried home by car, not expecting it to be carried or by bicycle power.

We need better methods of getting commuters to and from the train stations. The buses and shuttles need to meet trains and wait for them to leave to enable passengers to use both. This is true for both inward bound and outward bound commuters.

Growth is good only when the infrastructure is in place to withstand the growth. Without the infrastructure, growth is only making facilities poorer for those who need to use them.


Posted by Ummm, did anybody discuss other parts of the city?, a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 28, 2012 at 3:56 pm

Please note that not one single mention of anything in the southernmost part of town is reported in this article.

Moutain View is about to build a new, monstrous shopping center on our border with high density housing, a hotel and offices (Varying heights, probably 5-9 stories). The traffic from this development will affect south Palo Alto streets. I can hear the retail dollar sucking sounds already. I hope our city staff will PAY ATTENTION to this project as it develops, and I hope our City Council will direct them (and allocate resources) to work with MV to make sure the needs of south Palo Alto residents and southern research park road users are considered in the EIR process. The San Antonio Center project makes Arillaga's project look like a child's Lego project.

In addition, the former H-P/Mayfield Mall site on San Antonio Road in Palo Alto is about to be reoccupied after more than a decade of vacancy. This project will generate about 1,500-2,200 new car trips per day, slamming San Antonio/Middlefield and San Antonio/Charleston--already a parking lot during the peak hour.

The city and school district quibble about the future of Cubberley. It would be good to see some progress on that front. Status quo is clearly not an option.

Look south occasionally, Council. We vote too. It bothers me that there has been no mention at all of south Palo Alto reported in these conversations.

And, where is the transit that was supposed to alleviate the traffic impacts of all of the already built south PA development? In the south, our transit service (of all kinds) has only been reduced in recent years.


Posted by common sense, a resident of Midtown
on Dec 28, 2012 at 4:29 pm

My grades on the City Council Members:

Gail Price - Grade F: epitomizes special interest representation; examples: voted against allowing the ballot measure to reform arbitration with the firefighters union; voted for granting zoning changes which increase high density development for Lytton Gateway, and other projects. No leadership on the infrastructure issues.

Nancy Shepard - Grade F: for the same reasons as stated for Council member Price.

Larry Klein - Grade D: Some work on city employee pension reform, but voted against allowing the ballot measure to reform arbitration with he firefighters union. voted for graning zoning changes which increased high density development.

Sid Espinosa - Grade C: has voted for the zoning changes to increase development density, but has been a proponent for protecting parkland. No leadership on fiscal management.

Greg Scharf - Grade C: His reasoning for voting for allowing the zoning change to increase the developent density for the Lytton Gateway: "The building itself is a public benefit", pretty much defines him as a tool of the developer special interests. Raises his grade for his work on fiscal management.

Pat Burt - Grade B-: Another council member who sides with the developers in granting zoning changes for higher density development. Provided leadership in fiscal management.

Yia Wei Yeh - Grade B: helped in fiscal management, and in trying to bring a focus on the city's infrastructure needs.

Greg Schmid - A: consistent voice for the interest of the residents, and in prudent fiscal management

Karen Holman - A: consistent voice for the interests of the residents, and in prudent fiscal management.


Posted by Too late, a resident of Midtown
on Dec 28, 2012 at 4:53 pm

Ummm, the project in MV is already under construction. The EIR has been done for a while. Too late for PA to have any say on this matter-- not that PA should have any say to begin with.
I look forward to having this place available to shop at. I already do most of my shopping outside of PA. There is very little in the way of decent shopping in town (as resident points out above).
For too long we have been held hostage by the "we need to protect jj&f/the free market is bad" crowd. Any time a project is proposed we hear the usual whinings about "too much traffic/we need to protect local merchants" etc.


Posted by Peter K. Mueller, a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 29, 2012 at 5:21 pm

Good year end report on State of the City and thoughtful comments.
Getting to the new San Antonio shopping center other than my personal motor vehicle is a real worry brought out by one of the commentators above.
This is what's available now
West of Alma there is Park Blvd jogging to Wilkie way, a narrow winding bike & pedestrian bridge on to Miller Ave and jogging south San Antonio. There are a couple of traffic light controlled crossings.
From SW Palo Alto, west of El Camino there is a bike path around Terman Park ending at Los Altos Ave with a jog to Loucks Ave that ends at N. San Antonio Road. Crossing from there safely going a bit east to the shopping center is tricky.
From South Eastern Palo Alto it gets really hazardous. Making ones way south to San Antonio Ave there is a traffic light controlled crossing of Alma St and then some narrow path ways winding to Showers Drive. After one gets by the narrow residential area with car traffic oblivious to bikes Showers drive going west has a broad bike lane with access to the drives into the shopping center.
So definitely some infrastructure thoughts and development for enabling safer biking to and from Palo Alto are importantly needed.


Posted by Carol, a resident of Meadow Park
on Dec 29, 2012 at 7:29 pm

Los Altos would love to have such problems.


Posted by pat, a resident of Midtown
on Dec 30, 2012 at 12:22 pm

> Keene "and his pals went to china on our tax dollars."

Actually, they paid their own way.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields