Around Town | June 29, 2012 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - June 29, 2012

Around Town

THE RUMOR MILL ... After Gov. Jerry Brown signed the state budget on Wednesday, much of the buzz in Sacramento swirled around what wasn't in the document. This includes high-speed rail, a project that is expected to be the focus on a budget-trailer bill that will be released in the next week or two. The suspense around this trailer bill has created a flood of rumor-mongering around the Capitol, with both advocates and opponents of the controversial project ramping up their efforts to influence its immediate future, Palo Alto's lobbyist John Garamendi told the City Council's Rail Committee Thursday morning. "We've got an absolute million pieces moving as we try to figure out what's real and what's not real," Garamendi said. "What is real is that there is a tremendous amount of concern around Sacramento." The uncertainty, he said, has prompted labor unions and other proponents of the voter-approved project to step up their lobbying efforts, he said. "It's literally packed in the hallways," Garamendi said. "Not just labor but engineering firms are worried that this might be slipping away." One of the major questions revolves around a controversial proposal by Brown to give high-speed rail exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). After pressure from environmental groups, Brown backed away from this proposal, Garamendi said. But by the end of the week, Brown's office had indicated that the proposal to give the project exemptions from environmental law is still on the table. "We thought we won that by Thursday," Garamendi said. "By Friday, the governor said we aren't quite done with that discussion. A lot of people on the environmental side quickly realized that this is very much in play." Palo Alto, which officially opposes high-speed rail, has consistently voiced concerns about exempting the $68 billion project from CEQA. Earlier this month, the city sent a letter to state Sen. Joe Simitian urging him to vote against any further appropriations for high-speed rail. But the letter noted that if the Legislature were to move forward with the project, the appropriation language must guarantee that there will be "no modifications of any kind" to the environmental-review process.

This story contains 624 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields