News

School board eyes further budget cuts

Some board members looking for creative ways to save without impacting students' education

The school board continued to revise and refine the district's approach to mitigating its budget shortfall at a special meeting Tuesday morning, with a majority of its members pushing staff to identify further administrative cuts and to find creative ways of saving that will have the least impact on students' educational experiences.

Trustees provided feedback to a staff-compiled list of potential budget cuts, totaling $3.8 million, which most characterized as good progress toward having more options on the table to evaluate. The list is in addition to $3.6 million in proposed budget cuts that the board discussed last month.

In many ways, trustees urged staff to think more creatively in coming up with further savings. Board member Todd Collins brought his own list of possible reductions, from reallocating reserve funds designated for opening a new elementary school into the operating fund to rolling back automatic raises given to senior managers and administrators. President Terry Godfrey asked staff to be more "forward-looking" when it comes to forecasting the single largest item in the district's budget — teacher compensation — in terms of what other districts are paying their teachers. Trustee Melissa Baten Caswell reiterated a request for the district to find ways to be more operationally effective to save dollars.

"I think we are not yet there in terms of demonstrating to the community, really, that we have cut away from the classroom sufficiently so that the next right move is to cut into the educational mission of the district," board member Ken Dauber said.

On the staff proposals, trustees agreed that some are low-hanging fruit that they support, such as cutting back on weekend landscaping or reducing the district's contract with a local continuation high school to the actual number of seats needed, for example. Others, however, cut too close to the classroom for some board members' comfort.

Dauber said he opposed a proposal to not hire three additional teachers to help reduce class sizes at the high schools, which would save the district $375,000. Collins urged the creation of a formal class size policy that would guide such decisions, rather than making incremental budget-driven changes.

Dauber also said he would not support a reduction in the district's contracts with Asian Americans for Community Involvement and Stanford University to provide counseling services to students and families. (The reduction would retain these services only at the district's high schools.) Trustee Melissa Baten Caswell asked staff to provide more information around where these services fit in with the district's other on-campus counseling and psychological supports.

Board member Jennifer DiBrienza, a former teacher, said she was most concerned about a proposal to reduce the number of teachers on special assignments (TOSA) as well as to cut stipends for instructional supervisors, or department leads, at schools. Staff argued on Tuesday that these teacher-leadership positions are "essential" to the mission of the district — they drive professional development, guide implementation of new textbooks and standards, serve as instructional models for teachers in classrooms and are pushing forward ambitious districtwide goals, like increasing consistency among grading practices, homework and curriculum.

"These are things that appear to be administrative and yet they are very close to the classroom," DiBrienza said of the TOSA and instructional supervisor positions.

And while two of her colleagues, Dauber and Collins, pressed for more administrative cuts overall — Dauber said he expected to see about $2 or $2.5 million in reductions at the district office, about double what was proposed Tuesday — DiBrienza echoed staff concerns about the negative impact this could have. On Tuesday, McGee recommended keeping $952,000 out of $1.1 million in proposed district-office cuts to avoid a point where "our infrastructure would start to crumble."

"I think while we do need to continue to push, we need to listen to the professionals," DiBrienza said. "I am really concerned we are near that tipping point and I want to make sure we don't cross over the tipping point."

Baten Caswell said it was difficult for her to make a "value judgment" about the amount of administrative cuts without more detailed explanation of their specific impact. "If we did this, this is what would stop and this is what would continue," she said.

Other suggestions for savings board members made Tuesday included reviewing clerical positions, trimming a budget for conference travel expenses or using reserves for one-time costs such as managing compliance with a federal Office for Civil Rights resolution agreement. Collins also floated proposals to find programs and activities that could possibly be consolidated with the county or other school districts; to consider consolidating an elementary school given declining enrollment; and to roll back full-day kindergarten, which was launched this fall at all elementary schools.

"We need to dig deeper," Collins said. "We're still finding things. It's not surprising because it takes a long time to change your thinking … That's why we have these meetings — to challenge our thinking, to challenge staff's thinking, to hear from the community and really try to think out of the box a little bit."

Staff will bring budget recommendations to the board for further discussion in late April. The board will also have to weigh potential cuts against an estimated $1.6 million addition in costs from new programs and other efforts.

The district plans to schedule a public forum to solicit further feedback on the 2017-18 budget in the next few weeks.

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Comments

27 people like this
Posted by disgusted
a resident of another community
on Mar 7, 2017 at 9:01 pm

Suggestion: Conduct an anonymous and fair survey of teachers. Expected result---80-90% of teachers would probably say their teaching efficacy wouldn't be impacted by a loss of TOSAS in light of this severe budget deficit. From my vantage point, they seem barely helpful except to novice/struggling teachers, or TOSAS are okay if teacher doesn't have real curriculum to teach that day, or it can work if teacher is trying to earn principal brownie points. Definitely not necessary. Don't see any advantage/difference to my kids' learning. Focus on what these hard-working teachers need and want. End the deception. Stop trying to disguise board/district office efforts to preserve the grossly inflated staff at the the district office level (in the form of enormous numbers of TOSAS, among other positions) as something teachers need or want.


2 people like this
Posted by Bryan
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Mar 8, 2017 at 11:56 am

Can't believe Zuck doesn't pony up the dough for the good of the kids. Shame on him! [braced for the FB hasbara]


20 people like this
Posted by Private Parent
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Mar 8, 2017 at 12:42 pm

And here we see why DiBrienza was a bad choice for school board. She is defending teachers and administrators, rather than finding things to cut and serving the district's tax payers.

We are over spending. We have to fix it.


2 people like this
Posted by Ponu
a resident of Ohlone School
on Mar 18, 2017 at 8:38 am

A lean environment makes people save better. But where there is excess fat and lazy thrive.


Like this comment
Posted by Wayoflife
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 18, 2017 at 9:21 am

Leave the teachers alone! Make staff cuts in all depts for lack of work and conduct mandatory drug testing yearly. Where idle hands are lurk bad thinking and doing. Drain the swamp at PAUSD. $$ukaberg isn't the answer. You've already tried that, and now grades and mental health are an issue. Know this, a humble lowly person, knows not the conciet that is high as his wealth. Peace


1 person likes this
Posted by Wiser
a resident of Community Center
on Mar 18, 2017 at 9:37 am

Too many people not doing work is a sure sign that there is not enough to do.
IMHO reducing staff by half is a beginning. Only employ as many as needed. It wasn't that long ago the machine ran just as good.


2 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 18, 2017 at 10:53 pm

Sorry, but I will not trust this Board again with an ability to make sensible financial decisions.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Vina Enoteca to serve first 'Impossible burger' in Silicon Valley
By Elena Kadvany | 21 comments | 7,392 views

Coupon for Yourself and Your Partner
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,151 views

Housing Impact Fees and the Economy
By Steve Levy | 2 comments | 908 views

Planning for College Tours
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 416 views

 

Short story writers wanted!

The 31st Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult (15-17) and Teen (12-14) categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by April 13, 2017. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

Contest Details