Movies

Review: 'The Hunger Games: Catching Fire'

(Three stars)

It would be easy to damn "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" with the faint praise of calling it a competent sequel, which it is. This blockbuster franchise picture can feel somewhat ho-hum and repetitive (but then so did some of the Harry Potter sequels). By giving audiences a bit more to chew on than its predecessor, "Catching Fire" compensates for its longueurs.

Adapted by Simon Beaufoy and Michael Arndt (under his pseudonym Michael deBruyn) from Suzanne Collins' YA novel, "The Hunger Games: Catching Fire" gets a new director in Francis Lawrence ("I Am Legend"). But in true franchise fashion, the style and tone remain consistent with those established by Gary Ross in last year's "The Hunger Games."

For that matter, the plot has a certain "Potter"-y consistency. Crack archer Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence, on her game as always) again finds herself pressed into the titular battle to the death after some mutual mooning with childhood friend Gale (Liam Hemsworth), firmly situating fellow competitor and romantic-triangle-completer Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson) in the friend zone (yeah, like that'll last), participating in mass-media pomp and circumstance, and sizing up the 22 other contestants looking to bump Peeta and her off.

Oh, yes, we have twists, the up-front one being that the players in the 75th anniversary (and third "Quarter Quell") Hunger Games are all "experienced killers" reaped from the pool of former winners. Correction, as per Katniss' alcoholic mentor Haymitch (Woody Harrelson): "There are survivors; there's no winners." Among these new players are hunky Finnick Odair (Sam Claflin), bespectacled strategist Beetee (Jeffrey Wright) and hotheaded Johanna Mason (Jena Malone).

They all must submit to the shenanigans devised by gamemaker Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman), and that series of threats is best left unspoiled for those who haven't already read up on them. Suffice it to say the action plays out in a booby-trapped jungle island landscape (the film was shot in Oahu, Hawaii and Georgia).

But what used to be a narrative underpinning the totalitarian corruption from which bread and circuses are meant to divert attention has become superscript this time, with President Snow (Donald Sutherland) so deeply concerned about Katniss' capacity to incite an uprising amongst the wretched, increasingly angry masses that his usual handling tactic of blackmail swiftly escalates to murder plans.

"Catching Fire" gives Katniss PTSD, but the primary zeitgeisty element here is the media satire, fronted by Stanley Tucci's maniacal TV host and Elizabeth Banks' vapid fashion plate (who chirps, "We must feed the monster!").

"Catching Fire" teases out comparisons to the life of a young Hollywood star: celebrity under a microscope and a certain amount of duress, having to keep acting whenever a camera is around. The story certainly riffs on studio-concocted relationships (and/or "bearding") in the tight-smile photo ops of Katniss and Peeta.

Haymitch reminds Katniss, "Your job is to be a distraction from what the real problems are," and of course "The Hunger Games" could be fairly accused of being what it satirizes, but it's not without a thought in its deadly little head.

Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action, some frightening images, thematic elements, a suggestive situation and language. Two hours, 26 minutes.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by ActorsAreFurniture
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 22, 2013 at 12:07 pm

Well, I waited for the first one to appear on Amazon Prime, or was it NetFlix ... I suppose I can wait for this one too. I don't much understand the idea of referring to this movie as "competent" or "solid". This kind of movie to me is on a par with a children's book or a comic book, which many of them are, good only for wasting time if one has nothing better to do, like being sick. Who knows what these images are doing to the younger generation?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by hard to believe
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Nov 22, 2013 at 4:09 pm

Hard to believe that a movie about child mass murder is rated only PG-13. Hated the first one because of the mass murder theme. Skipping the second one. Hope there is no third.

If you really want to think about this topic, go read Lord of the Flies Again.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 36 comments | 2,943 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,075 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,588 views

Mothers, daughters, books, and boxes
By Sally Torbey | 4 comments | 1,211 views

Campaign Endorsements: Behind the Curtain
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,094 views